Answer :
Sure! Here is a step-by-step solution for the inequality [tex]$-62 \leq f + 2$[/tex]:
1. We start with the inequality:
[tex]$$-62 \leq f + 2$$[/tex]
2. Our goal is to isolate the variable [tex]\( f \)[/tex]. To do this, we need to get rid of the constant term on the right-hand side of the inequality. Currently, we have a "+2" next to [tex]\( f \)[/tex]. So we should subtract 2 from both sides of the inequality to get [tex]\( f \)[/tex] by itself.
3. Subtract 2 from both sides of the inequality:
[tex]$$-62 - 2 \leq f + 2 - 2$$[/tex]
4. Simplify both sides:
[tex]$$-64 \leq f$$[/tex]
So the solution to the inequality is:
[tex]$$-64 \leq f$$[/tex]
This can also be written as [tex]\( f \geq -64 \)[/tex]. Therefore, any value of [tex]\( f \)[/tex] that is greater than or equal to -64 will satisfy the inequality.
1. We start with the inequality:
[tex]$$-62 \leq f + 2$$[/tex]
2. Our goal is to isolate the variable [tex]\( f \)[/tex]. To do this, we need to get rid of the constant term on the right-hand side of the inequality. Currently, we have a "+2" next to [tex]\( f \)[/tex]. So we should subtract 2 from both sides of the inequality to get [tex]\( f \)[/tex] by itself.
3. Subtract 2 from both sides of the inequality:
[tex]$$-62 - 2 \leq f + 2 - 2$$[/tex]
4. Simplify both sides:
[tex]$$-64 \leq f$$[/tex]
So the solution to the inequality is:
[tex]$$-64 \leq f$$[/tex]
This can also be written as [tex]\( f \geq -64 \)[/tex]. Therefore, any value of [tex]\( f \)[/tex] that is greater than or equal to -64 will satisfy the inequality.
