Answer :
The hypothesis that best explains observed wandering behaviour in a population dominated by flatwing males is in the absence of chirping, flatwing males find mates via wandering. So, the correct option is B.
How does this hypothesis make sense?
This theory makes sense since flatwing males are unable to generate the characteristic chirping sound which wild-type males make to attract females. As a result, they may need to roam around more to find partners, increasing their chances of reproducing. The other hypotheses do not appear to be as likely to explain the observed behaviour because there is no evidence that travelling is associated with access to new sources of food or protection from competition or parasites.
The hypothesis which most explains observed wandering behavior in a flatwing male-dominated population is Flatwing males find mates by roving in the absence of chirping.
Therefore, the correct option is B.
Learn more about Hypothesis, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29519577
#SPJ2
Answer:
B/D
Explanation:
it's either B because if a flat Wing male can't find a female that likes is tripping is it helpful to go around and wander and maybe he'll find a mate
or it's D because there's a lot of crickets out in the open and where everybody else is his group gets everywhere so what I'm saying is it help to wander cuz that reduces the competition there so many male chirping that it's kind of hard to find a certain one that will attract the female
