Answer :
The reason for the difference in climate between San Francisco and Wichita can be attributed to two main factors: their proximity to the ocean and their proximity to the mountains. Option B and D are the correct answer.
b. Their proximity to the ocean is different:
San Francisco is located on the western coast of the United States and is in close proximity to the Pacific Ocean. The presence of the ocean has a moderating effect on the climate of San Francisco. The ocean acts as a heat sink, absorbing and releasing heat slowly, which helps to moderate the temperature and create a more moderate climate in the region.
On the other hand, Wichita is located in the interior of the United States, far away from any significant bodies of water. The absence of a nearby ocean means that Wichita does not benefit from the moderating influence of the ocean's thermal inertia. As a result, the climate in Wichita tends to be more extreme, with hotter summers and colder winters compared to San Francisco.
d. Their proximity to the mountains is different:
San Francisco is situated near the Coast Ranges, which are relatively low-lying mountains. These mountains act as a barrier, preventing extreme weather systems from reaching the city. They also contribute to the formation of a marine layer, which brings cooler temperatures and fog to the region, further moderating the climate.
Wichita, on the other hand, is located in the Great Plains region, which is relatively flat and lacks significant mountain barriers. As a result, Wichita is more exposed to the influence of continental air masses, leading to more extreme temperature fluctuations and weather conditions.
Option B and D are the correct answer.
For such more question on mountains:
https://brainly.com/question/101267
#SPJ11
