Answer :
Final answer:
The sentence was revised for conciseness without changing its meaning. The debate around paying college athletes involves potential benefits and challenges for both colleges and athletes. States are increasingly considering laws to allow student athletes to be paid.
Explanation:
To revise the sentence for conciseness, we could say: "College athletes should be paid by the hour for participating in practices and games." This sentence is more succinct and still retains the original meaning. In terms of the debate surrounding whether student athletes should be compensated, there are multiple angles to consider.
Colleges may benefit from paying student athletes as it could enhance recruitment, potentially leading to stronger teams and more revenue from sports programs. However, there could also be financial and logistical challenges, including the redistribution of sports budgets and potential impacts on other programs. For college athletes, being paid could offer financial support and recognition for their significant contributions to college sports, but might also lead to changes in their amateur status, impacting their eligibility and the integrity of college sports.
Regarding the question should states dictate that student athletes can be paid to play college sports, the Fair Pay to Play Act passed by California, allowing athletes to earn from their names, images, and likenesses, is a pivotal development. Similar measures in other states are also bringing this issue to the forefront, suggesting a trend towards allowing compensation for college athletes.
Final answer:
College athletes should be paid for participating in practices and games.
Explanation:
College athletes should be paid for participating in practices and games.
Learn more about Paying college athletes here:
https://brainly.com/question/32505363
