Answer :
Final answer:
Probable cause and reasonable suspicion are standards of proof in law used by law enforcement to assess the legality of stopping, searching, or arresting individuals. Probable cause is a higher standard usually required for securing warrants, while reasonable suspicion is a lower threshold that allows for temporary detentions. Both concepts help protect citizens' rights against unlawful searches and seizures.
Explanation:
Understanding Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion
Probable cause and reasonable suspicion are essential concepts in law enforcement and constitutional law. They are both standards used to determine the legality of police actions in various situations.
Probable Cause
Probable cause is the legal standard required for law enforcement to obtain a search warrant or to make an arrest. This standard is higher than reasonable suspicion and is based on the facts and circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime is present. For example, police need probable cause to enter a property without a warrant in exigent circumstances.
Reasonable Suspicion
On the other hand, reasonable suspicion is a lower standard, enabling police to stop and briefly detain a person if they have specific facts suggesting that the person is involved in criminal activity. This was established in the landmark Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio (1968), where the Court ruled that police could conduct a stop and frisk based on reasonable suspicion. This standard does not require as much evidence as probable cause.
Therefore, in response to the question, both probable cause and reasonable suspicion are standards of proof that guide police action and limit government authority when interacting with citizens.
Learn more about standards of proof here:
https://brainly.com/question/40721801
