College

**Proposition 187: The Rise of the Latino Vote**
*Case Study on Social Movements and Government Reactions*

1. Describe the historical background of racial animosity in California and the United States.
2. Describe the social, political, and economic context of the time/place that led to Proposition 187.
3. What was the role of multiracial coalitions in the campaign against Proposition 187? What groups worked together?
4. What was the role of youth and the arts in the campaigns against Proposition 187?
5. What role did the government, courts, and people play in the Proposition 187 campaign?
6. What were the long-term impacts of the Proposition 187 campaigns in California?

Answer :

The historical background of racial animosity in California and the United States includes a long history of discrimination and prejudice against various racial and ethnic groups, particularly African Americans, Native Americans, and Latinos. This discrimination has taken many forms, including segregation, exclusion from political and economic power, and violence.

Proposition 187 was a ballot initiative introduced in California in 1994 that sought to deny public services, including education and healthcare, to undocumented immigrants. The social, political, and economic context of the time was characterized by a recession, rising crime rates, and a backlash against immigration, particularly from Mexico. Proposition 187 was seen by many as a response to these challenges.

Multiracial coalitions played a significant role in the campaign against Proposition 187. These coalitions included Latino and immigrant rights groups, civil rights organizations, labor unions, and progressive political organizations. African American, Asian American, and Native American groups also joined the campaign.

N/A

Youth and the arts played an important role in the campaigns against Proposition 187. Youth groups organized protests, rallies, and marches, and used social media to mobilize support. Artists and musicians created posters, murals, and songs that expressed opposition to the initiative and promoted the values of inclusion and diversity.

The government, courts, and people played different roles in the Proposition 187 campaign. The government, particularly the Republican Party, supported the initiative, while the Democratic Party and some individual politicians opposed it. The courts ultimately struck down key provisions of the initiative as unconstitutional. The people of California were deeply divided on the issue, with many supporting the initiative as a way to address the challenges of immigration and others opposing it as discriminatory and harmful.

The long-term impacts of the Proposition 187 campaigns in California included the mobilization of Latino and immigrant communities, the development of multiracial coalitions, and a shift in the political landscape of the state. The campaign helped to galvanize the Latino vote and led to the election of more Latino politicians. It also contributed to a broader national debate about immigration policy and the rights of undocumented immigrants.

Answer:

asa

Explanation:

a