Dear beloved readers, welcome to our website! We hope your visit here brings you valuable insights and meaningful inspiration. Thank you for taking the time to stop by and explore the content we've prepared for you.
------------------------------------------------ Power Tool Company manufactures table saws with several safety devices, including a permanent blade guard to prevent the user's hands from touching the blade while it is moving. Ralph buys a Power table saw but removes the blade guard because it inhibits the type of work he wants to do. Later, Ralph is injured while using the saw. If the blade guard had been left on, Ralph would not have been injured. Ralph sues Power Tool Co. under a strict liability theory.

The best defense that Power could raise based on these facts is:

A) Supervening event
B) Assumption of risk
C) Generally known dangers
D) State of the art
E) Misuse of the product

Power Tool Company's best defense against Ralph's strict liability suit is abuse of the product. This defense is premised on Ralph removing a key safety feature, the blade guard, which led to his injury.

Explanation:

In the given scenario, the most robust defense that Power Tool Company could raise against Ralph's suit under a strict liability theory would be E) misuse of the product. By removing the blade guard, a key safety device, Ralph altered the product from its intended, safe use. His injury resulted from this modification. It is essential for the functionality and safety of the tool that it is used as intended and designed by the manufacturer. This kind of defense is based on the principle that a user should bear the responsibility for injuries when the product has not been used correctly.

Learn more about Product Liability and Misuse here:

https://brainly.com/question/30025924

#SPJ11