College

Patrick and Susie just welcomed a set of twins to their family and need to decide how to purchase health insurance for the babies.

Patrick's Employer:
- Monthly Premium: [tex]$\$[/tex] 378[tex]$ for Patrick

- Employer Contribution: $[/tex]100 \%[tex]$ for Patrick

- Additional Beneficiary (each): $[/tex]\[tex]$ 280$[/tex]
- Employer Contribution for Additional Beneficiaries: [tex]$0 \%$[/tex]

Susie's Employer:
- Monthly Premium: [tex]$\$[/tex] 403[tex]$ for Susie

- Employer Contribution: $[/tex]63 \%[tex]$ for Susie

- Additional Beneficiary (each): $[/tex]\[tex]$ 310$[/tex]
- Employer Contribution for Additional Beneficiaries: [tex]$32 \%$[/tex]

Which would be the most economical way to purchase health insurance for the family?

a. Insure the entire family (Patrick, Susie, and the twins) with Patrick's employer.
b. Insure the entire family (Patrick, Susie, and the twins) with Susie's employer.
c. Insure Patrick with his employer and Susie with her employer, adding the twins to one of their plans.

Answer :

To determine the most economical way to purchase health insurance for the family, we need to compare the total costs for each option:

### Option 1: Insure the entire family through Patrick's employer

- Patrick's premium: Patrick's employer pays 100% of his premium, so Patrick's cost is [tex]$0.
- Additional beneficiaries: Susie and the twins (three additional beneficiaries) each have a premium of $[/tex]280 that Patrick’s employer will not cover.

So, the total cost for Patrick's employer is:
- For the additional beneficiaries: [tex]\( 3 \times \$280 = \$840 \)[/tex]

The total cost when insuring the whole family through Patrick's employer is \[tex]$840.

### Option 2: Insure the entire family through Susie's employer

- Susie's premium: Susie's employer pays 63% of her \$[/tex]403 premium. We calculate Susie's cost as the remaining 37%:
[tex]\( \$403 \times (1 - 0.63) = \$403 \times 0.37 = \$149.11 \)[/tex]

- Additional beneficiaries: Susie's employer offers to pay 63% of the \[tex]$310 premium for each additional beneficiary (Patrick and the twins), so Susie would pay 37% of the \$[/tex]310 for each:
[tex]\( 3 \times \$310 \times (1 - 0.63) = 3 \times \$310 \times 0.37 = \$344.10 \)[/tex]

The total cost when insuring the whole family through Susie’s employer is:
- For Susie and additional beneficiaries: [tex]\( \$149.11 + \$344.10 = \$493.21 \)[/tex]

### Conclusion

The most economical option is to insure the family through Susie's employer, with a total cost of \[tex]$493.21, as this option costs less compared to insuring through Patrick's employer, which totals \$[/tex]840.