Answer :
Final answer:
The correct answer is True, as most stops require reasonable suspicion, while arrests and search warrants must be based on probable cause. These two standards, rooted in legal precedent, ensure that law enforcement has adequate justification for their actions. Understanding this distinction is crucial in legal contexts and law enforcement practices.
Explanation:
Understanding Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause
The statement regarding reasonable suspicion and probable cause is True. In the realm of law enforcement, these two terms represent different standards required for police stops and searches.
Reasonable suspicion allows police officers to stop and briefly detain an individual if they have a reasonable belief that the person is engaged in criminal activity, as established in the landmark case Terry v. Ohio (1968). This is a lower standard than probable cause, which is necessary for obtaining search warrants or conducting arrests. Probable cause requires sufficient evidence that a crime has been committed or that evidence related to a crime can be found.
For example, if a police officer observes a person engaging in suspicious behavior, they may stop and question that person based on reasonable suspicion. If the officer later gathers enough evidence indicating that the individual committed a crime, they can then arrest them based on probable cause. Thus, the distinction between these standards ensures that individuals' rights are protected while allowing law enforcement to act on potential criminal activity.
Learn more about Search and Seizure Standards here:
https://brainly.com/question/40342509
