Answer :
Final answer:
In Army Anti-Terrorism Level 1 training, 'Positive performance reviews' is not an early indicator of a potential insider threat, while indicators like a sudden change in behaviour, disregard for security measures, and frequent absences from work are. Positive performance typically indicates good job performance and is not associated with potential insider threats. The correct answer is d) Positive performance reviews.
Explanation:
In the context of Army Anti-Terrorism Level 1 training, the following options are considered early indicators of a potential insider threat: a sudden change in behaviour, disregard for security measures, and frequent absences from work. However, the option 'Positive performance reviews' is not an early indicator of an insider threat. Positive reviews typically signify satisfactory or exceptional job performance and are generally a desirable outcome.
It is essential to recognize that while work attitudes can predict work behaviour, including performance, citizenship behaviours, absenteeism, and turnover, positive performance evaluations do not necessarily signal an insider threat. In fact, individuals showing indicators such as disregard for security measures or frequent absences may be considered more at risk of becoming an insider threat, especially if these behaviours represent a significant departure from their normal conduct.
Therefore, in anti-terrorism and security contexts, it’s imperative to be vigilant for changes that could suggest a counterproductive shift in an individual's alignment with the organization's values or mission, rather than a solid performance record which is a positive sign.
The correct option is (d) Positive performance reviews. In the context of Army Anti-Terrorism Level 1 guidance, this is not considered an early indicator of a potential insider threat. Early indicators generally focus on behaviors that suggest a person may be becoming disaffected, unreliable, or a risk to security, while positive performance reviews typically indicate satisfactory job performance and do not raise red flags regarding insider threats.
Insider threat awareness is crucial in keeping institutions secure from potential malicious actors within their own ranks. The early indicators of an insider threat typically include observable behaviors that could suggest a departure from normal conduct or loyalty to the organization. A sudden change in behavior may suggest personal issues or a shift in allegiance, disregard for security measures could indicate a lack of respect for the institution's protocols, and frequent absences from work may be a sign of disengagement or secretive activity. On the contrary, positive performance reviews usually reflect an individual's competence and commitment to their job, which is why they are not considered an early warning sign of an insider threat according to Army anti-terrorism guidelines. It's essential to remain vigilant for negative actions or warning signs rather than positive feedback on performance.
