Answer :
Final answer:
If a judge agrees with the majority's decision but for different reasons, they write a concurring opinion. Option b is correct.
Explanation:
If a judge agrees with the majority's decision but for differing reasons, that judge may write a concurring opinion. This occurs when, while agreeing with the overall judgment or outcome, a justice or judge does not agree with the reasoning or legal principles behind the majority's decision.
It allows the justice to present their interpretation of the law while still reinforcing the judgment — essentially, they 'concur' with the overall decision but provide their unique viewpoint or analysis.
It's also pertinent to mention that there are other types of opinions. A dissenting opinion is one where the justice disagrees with both the majority's decision and reasoning. A dual court system involves a federal and state level, each with its own branches, judgments, and dissents. Lastly, the majority opinion is the ruling agreed upon by more than half the justices and this sets a precedent for future cases.
Option b is correct.
Learn more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/31448478
#SPJ11
