Answer :
Final answer:
The Evolving Standards of Decency principle guides the Supreme Court's interpretation of the 8th Amendment by adapting legal definitions based on changing societal norms. Notable cases like Furman v. Georgia and Roper v. Simmons illustrate how these standards influence rulings on cruel and unusual punishment. This concept ensures that the justice system reflects modern expectations of human rights and dignity.
Explanation:
Evolving Standards of Decency and the 8th Amendment
The Evolving Standards of Decency is a legal principle used by the Supreme Court of the United States when interpreting the 8th Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. This concept suggests that what is considered acceptable or humane treatment changes over time, influenced by societal norms, values, and a greater understanding of human rights.
For example, in the landmark case of Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Court ruled that the death penalty as it was applied at the time was arbitrary and constituted cruel and unusual punishment. This decision reflected a shift in public perception regarding capital punishment. Similarly, in Roper v. Simmons (2005), the Court ruled that executing individuals who were under the age of 18 at the time of their crime was unconstitutional, citing evolving social standards that recognize the developmental differences between minors and adults.
Thus, the framework of Evolving Standards of Decency allows the Supreme Court to adapt its interpretations of the 8th Amendment in alignment with contemporary views on justice and humanity.
Learn more about Evolving Standards of Decency here:
https://brainly.com/question/43949669
