Answer :
Final answer:
The case opinion in Benton v. Maryland (1969) is similar to Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) as they both focused on the right to legal representation for individuals facing criminal charges.
Explanation:
The case opinion in Benton v. Maryland (1969) can be compared to Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).
Both cases dealt with the right to legal representation for individuals facing criminal charges.
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court established that defendants facing felony charges must be provided with legal representation, even if they cannot afford it.
Similarly, in Benton v. Maryland, the Court held that the state cannot deny a defendant the right to counsel when they are tried for a serious crime, even if they had previously been acquitted of a related offense.
Learn more about Right to legal representation for defendants here:
https://brainly.com/question/31941626
#SPJ1
Final answer:
Benton v. Maryland and Gideon v. Wainwright both expanded constitutional protections through the Fourteenth Amendment, applying the double jeopardy protection and the right to counsel to individual states respectively.
Explanation:
The case opinion in Benton v. Maryland (1969) is comparable to Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) insofar as both cases expanded the protection of constitutional rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Benton v. Maryland overturned a previous decision and held that the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy applies to the states. Gideon v. Wainwright established that the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel was a fundamental right and applied to the states, meaning legally that states are required to provide an attorney to defendants in criminal cases who are unable to afford their own representation. Both rulings strengthened the provisions for fair trials and underscored the notion that certain constitutional protections are integral to liberty and justice, and must be upheld at both federal and state levels.
