Answer :
Final answer:
In this case, Dr. Bob should be entitled to have the gifts returned or receive payment for their fair market value.
Explanation:
In this case, Susie should not be allowed to keep all of the gifts. The legal argument for Dr. Bob is that the gifts were conditional upon the marriage taking place. This is known as a condition precedent in contract law. If the condition is not met, the gifts must be returned.
Dr. Bob can argue that the gifts were given with the expectation of marriage and were not intended as unconditional gifts. He can also argue that Susie's pattern of behavior, as described in the question, demonstrates a lack of intent to marry.
Therefore, Dr. Bob is entitled to have the gifts returned or receive payment for their fair market value.
Learn more about Gifts here:
https://brainly.com/question/36739325
#SPJ11