High School

Does this argument pass the premise test, and why?

Premise 1: Every member of the Beatles is famous.
Premise 2: Obama is a member of the Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Obama is famous.

(Note: The argument is logically valid but factually incorrect, as Obama is not a member of the Beatles.)

Answer :

Final answer:

The argument does not pass the premise test because, while the conclusion 'Obama is famous' is true, it is not supported by the given premises — specifically, the false premise that 'Obama is a member of the Beatles'.

Explanation:

Within the context of logical reasoning, the argument presented does not pass the premise test. The

premise test involves evaluating whether the premises (statements upon which an argument is based), are true. The first premise, 'Every member of the Beatles is famous', is true. However, the second premise, 'Obama is a member of the Beatles', is not true. Obama is not a member of the Beatles, but a notable and famous figure in his own right, primarily through his role as a former president of the United States. Therefore, while the conclusion that 'Obama is famous' is true, it is not supported by the premises provided, hence failing the premise test.

Learn more about Premise Test

https://brainly.com/question/32821319

#SPJ11

Final answer:

The argument does not pass the premise test because the premises are not true.

Explanation:

The argument does not pass the premise test. In order for an argument to pass the premise test, the conclusion must follow logically from the premises.

In this argument, premise 1 states that every member of the Beatles is famous. However, premise 2 states that Obama is a member of the Beatles, which is factually incorrect. Therefore, the premises are not true and the argument fails to establish the conclusion that Obama is famous.

In logic, it is important for the premises to be true in order to support the conclusion. If the premises are not true, then the argument is considered invalid.

Learn more about Premise test