Alec Baldwin was involved in a tragic shooting event last year on the set of the movie "Rust" that killed a cinematographer and injured the director on the set. This event has led to multiple lawsuits (as you can imagine). Mr. Baldwin just settled the wrongful death lawsuit brought by the cinematographer's family and has now brought his own lawsuit (filed last Friday) against the film's armorer, the first assistant director, the crew member in charge of props, and the primary supplier of guns and ammunition to the film's set location. His suit names Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the film’s armorer, who was in charge of handling guns and ammunition on set; Dave Halls, the first assistant director, who handed the gun to Mr. Baldwin that day and declared it safe; Sarah Zachry, the crew member in charge of props; and Seth Kenney, who has been described as the primary supplier of guns and ammunition to the film set. A lawyer for Mr. Baldwin, Luke Nikas, wrote in the complaint that they had not fulfilled their professional duty to maintain safety on set.

In your opinion, which of the named defendants (if any) in Alec Baldwin's lawsuit should be held liable for negligence? Why (what duty do you think they breached)?

In this tragic shooting incident on the set of the movie "Rust," Alec Baldwin's lawsuit holds the film's armorer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, and the first assistant director, Dave Halls, accountable for negligence. As the armorer, Gutierrez-Reed was responsible for handling guns and ammunition on set, ensuring their safety and proper functioning. If there were any issues with the weapon used by Baldwin, it suggests a failure on Gutierrez-Reed's part to adequately inspect and maintain the firearm. The first assistant director, Halls, played a crucial role in safety protocols on set and declared the gun safe before handing it to Baldwin. If Halls failed to properly assess the weapon's condition, he too could be considered negligent.

In a film production, the armorer holds a significant responsibility in maintaining the safety of weapons used on set. They are expected to have expert knowledge and experience in handling firearms, including regular inspections, maintenance, and proper storage. Any failure on the armorer's part to ensure the weapon's safety can result in tragic incidents like the one that occurred. Similarly, the first assistant director, as part of their role, is responsible for overseeing safety measures and protocols on set. Their duty includes verifying the safety of firearms before actors use them. If Halls declared the gun safe without conducting a thorough inspection, he may have breached his duty of care.

The investigation and legal proceedings will likely provide more insight into the specific actions or omissions that contributed to the tragic incident. Each defendant's level of negligence, if any, will be assessed based on their professional duties and responsibilities. Ultimately, the courts will determine liability based on the evidence presented.

Learn more about Assistant director

brainly.com/question/30011981

#SPJ11