Answer :
Final answer:
Justices Black and Frankfurter have different legal arguments in their opinions, and their personal backgrounds are not mentioned in the provided information. The excerpts do not provide enough information to compare their writing styles or political affiliations.
Explanation:
a) Legal Arguments:
Justices Black and Frankfurter present different legal arguments in their opinions. Justice Black argues that the defendants' rights were violated during the trial, using the example of exploiting their alien blood and unpopular social views. On the other hand, Justice Frankfurter criticizes the trial judge for cooperating with the process and allowing political passion to influence the proceedings.
b) Personal Backgrounds:
The personal backgrounds of Justices Black and Frankfurter are not explicitly mentioned in the provided information. Therefore, we do not have any specific details about their personal backgrounds to compare.
c) Writing Styles:
The excerpts do not provide enough information to directly compare the writing styles of Justices Black and Frankfurter.
d) Political Affiliations:
The provided excerpts do not mention the political affiliations of Justices Black and Frankfurter, so we cannot compare them based on their political affiliations.
Learn more about comparing opinions of Justices Black and Frankfurter here:
https://brainly.com/question/36481124
#SPJ11
