According to the article, Snitch's team of researchers used technology to locate poachers before they committed the crime.

Do you believe that there is any danger in a government deciding to target criminals who they think might likely commit a crime in the future (but haven't yet)?

There are dangers in a government deciding to target potential criminals, including violations of rights, pre-emptive punishment, and potential misuse of power. However, such approaches may also prevent crimes and protect society.

Explanation:

Yes, there might be some dangers in a government deciding to target individuals who they believe are likely to commit a crime in the future. Notably, this could lead to potential violations of individuals' rights and civil liberties. For instance, it could be seen as a form of pre-emptive punishment, which goes against the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. In addition, this might raise concerns about potential misuse of power, bias, and discrimination.

However, it's also important to consider that such approaches might also have been designed to protect society by preventing crimes before they occur. It's a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both the potential benefits and risks.

Learn more about Pre-emptive Targeting here:

https://brainly.com/question/32297146

#SPJ11

According to the article, Snitch's team of researchers used technology to locate poachers before they committed the crime.Do you believe that there is any danger in a government deciding to target criminals who they think might likely commit a crime in the future (but haven't yet)?

Answer :

Final answer:

Explanation:

Learn more about Pre-emptive Targeting here:

Other Questions

According to the article, Snitch's team of researchers used technology to locate poachers before they committed the crime.

Do you believe that there is any danger in a government deciding to target criminals who they think might likely commit a crime in the future (but haven't yet)?