Answer :
According to the Ainslie-Rachlin model of self-control, the value of a reward b. increases more sharply as it becomes more imminent .Therefore, b. increases more sharply as it becomes more imminent is correct.
The Ainslie-Rachlin model of self-control provides insights into how individuals make decisions regarding delayed rewards.
According to this model, the value of a reward is dynamic and is influenced by the temporal proximity of the reward.
As a reward becomes more imminent, the subjective value of that reward increases more sharply.
This means that individuals tend to assign greater importance or desirability to a reward as the time until its receipt decreases.
The model suggests that this increase in value is not linear but exhibits a steeper incline as the reward approaches.
The rationale behind this phenomenon lies in the concept of hyperbolic discounting, a key element of the Ainslie-Rachlin model.
Hyperbolic discounting implies that individuals heavily weigh the value of immediate rewards compared to delayed rewards, and this inclination intensifies as the delay shortens.
The model posits that people may struggle with self-control when faced with choices between smaller, more immediate rewards and larger, delayed rewards, as the allure of the imminent reward becomes disproportionately compelling.
According to the Ainslie-Rachlin model, the value of a reward increases more sharply as it becomes more imminent, reflecting the complex interplay of time, perception, and decision-making in the realm of self-control and reward preference.
For such a more question on value
https://brainly.com/question/13904196
#SPJ3
Answer:
The correct answer is option b.
Explanation:
On the basis of the self-control model given by Ainslie-Rachlin, on certain occasions, there is a change in preference when the time for waiting for bigger reward increases and a smaller reward is offered in brief time duration. This model presumes the value of the reward to be a hyperbolic function of the delay.
The value of the reward appears to increase more sharply when the delay time diminishes and the reward is about to be attained. For example, a child having a birthday party after three weeks and is asked to opt between the chocolate bar present to it at the moment and the birthday party.
Then in the given case, the child will opt for the chocolate bar over the party as three weeks is a long time duration, and thus, the value of the reward is smaller in comparison to the bar of chocolate that can be achieved at the instant moment.
