A group of nutritionists is hoping to prove that a new soybean compound has more protein per gram than roast beef, which has a natural protein content of 20. A random sample of 5 batches of soy compound has been tested, producing protein contents of 15, 22, 17, 18, and 23. What assumption(s) do we have to make in order to carry out a legitimate test of the nutritionists' claim?

To test the claim about the protein content of soybeans versus beef, we need to make both statistical assumptions (such as randomness, independence, and normality of the measurements) and biological assumptions (including accurate and representative measurement, and consistency across both food items).

Explanation:

The assumptions we need to make can be categorized under statistical assumptions and biological assumptions. From a statistical perspective, we typically make assumptions such as: 1) the soybean protein measurements were taken from a random sample of batches, 2) the measurements are independent of each other, and 3) the distribution of protein content in soybeans is normal.

Biological assumptions might include: 1) that the protein content can be accurately measured, 2) that the values are representative for all batches of the soybean compound, and 3) that the method to determine protein content is consistent across both the soybean compound and roast beef.

Please note that these assumptions serve as a basis to conduct a legitimate statistical test, and each assumption has implications if violated. For example, if the distribution of protein content in soybeans is not normal, it might affect the validity of your test results.

Learn more about Statistical Assumptions here:

https://brainly.com/question/36680288

#SPJ11