Answer :
Final answer:
Probable cause is a stricter standard than reasonable suspicion, which is a lower threshold for law enforcement to briefly detain individuals based on suspicion. In legal proceedings, probable cause is necessary for arrests and securing warrants. The distinction is essential in understanding law enforcement protocols.
Explanation:
Understanding Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion
Probable cause is indeed a stiffer requirement than reasonable suspicion.
In the legal context, probable cause is the standard used when judges issue warrants or when police act under exigent circumstances, meaning they have a strong belief that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime is present. On the other hand, reasonable suspicion is a lower standard that allows law enforcement to stop and briefly detain a person for questioning based solely on a reasonable belief that the person may be involved in criminal activity.
For example, in the case of Terry v. Ohio (1968), the Supreme Court ruled that police can conduct a stop-and-frisk if they have reasonable suspicion, which is not enough for an arrest or a warrant. Thus, it is clear that the requirement of probable cause is higher and must be met to conduct more invasive searches and arrests.
Learn more about Legal Standards here:
https://brainly.com/question/33269683
